Court considers compensation in 2019 submarine fire case that killed 34 people – edhat

In a crucial court debate, the consequences of the 2019 Conception The fire on a submersible that killed 34 people in a devastating maritime tragedy has flared up again as discussions over compensation flare up.

Jerry Boylan, the boat’s captain, found himself at the center of a legal battle last Thursday over financial compensation for the victims’ families after being convicted of negligence that led to the worst maritime disaster in recent U.S. history.

Boylan had previously been sentenced to four years in prison, suspended, under a historic law, for manslaughter by sailors. The conviction was based on his failure to comply with safety regulations, in particular the lack of a night watch that could have detected the fire earlier.

The dispute now revolves around the extent and type of restitution. The prosecution is arguing for the funeral and other costs to be covered. However, Boylan’s lawyer Gabriela Rivera doubts the connection between Boylan’s actions and the tragic consequences and suggests that financial penalties should be limited to proven expenses.

Judge George Wu, who is presiding over the case, emphasized Boylan’s proven failure to comply with safety standards during his trial and rejected the defense’s arguments against restitution. But the defense paints a picture of Boylan’s financial inability, pointing to his dependence on Social Security and his bleak employment prospects.

This trial appears to be a continuation of the coverage of the Santa Cruz Island disaster and sparked legislative and maritime safety reforms. In addition, civil litigation is currently underway against various parties, including the boat owners and the Coast Guard.

The next hearing on the refund amounts is scheduled for July 29.